Are Senators Clinton and McCain qualified to be president?

I'm still reading people I love talking about Hillary Clinton for president. I don't get it. Anyone who is still considering Hillary Clinton or John McCain as president should take a closer look at their records regarding 9/11, the greatest test of our nation in this century, though Katrina, wild fires and the Mississippi floods are testing our metal too.

"Are Senators Clinton and McCain qualified to be president?" (not that our current one is.)

Based on results, I don't think so.

9/11 Site Workers Hearing: Freddy Cordero Testimony




I know Senator McCain is not qualified based on his writing the intro to Debunking 9/11 Myths . He's sold on not dealing with what happened and why. A recent 9/11 hunger striker outside of his office, Blair Gadsby, was only able to get the promise of a meeting with Senator McCain at some point in the future, if then, to discuss the matter. A call from Arizona State Senator Karen Johnson to Senator McCain regarding 9/11 is still waiting a response.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lgEpaLVjgo

When it comes to the industrial/military/congressional complex, Senator McCain's got two of the three covered and his wife has the third. I live in Arizona. I'm not voting for Senator John McCain.

I believe it's time to follow Dwight Eisenhower's advice. To survive we must take control of our nation out of the hands of the industrial/military/congressional complex, with their toxic fuels and foods, and fix our problems now, before it's too late. Any strategy that includes a 100 year war is not one that is going to work.

I've been frustrated for years at Senator Clinton's failures in leadership during this 9/11 era. At the beginning of this crisis I expected her to call for an independent investigation; get the funds to evacuate people in the City exposed to the toxic soup called World Trade Center Dust (hemp legalization and tax would finance the process); open her office for information to help folks be safer in toxic environments; make pro-active medical attention available for those who need it dealing with World Trade Center Illness; and demand justice for those responsible.

I left 10 NY years ago when I realized the state was being run by the politically appointed via stolen elections (like zero votes for Obama in 80 Districts in New York, many in Harlem)

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/16/nyregion/16vote.html?hp

"In the Harlem district, for instance, where the primary night returns suggested a 141 to 0 sweep by Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, the vote now stands at 261 to 136. In an even more heavily black district in Brooklyn — where the vote on primary night was recorded as 118 to 0 for Mrs. Clinton — she now barely leads, 118 to 116."

generational poverty pimps, their friends and family.

When WTC 1, 2 and 7 became toxic dust, Senator Clinton was in Washington and gave a great speech on 9/12/01 in praise of the president and national resolve.

Has she yet called for an investigation into the 9/11 Truth movement which has documented thermite, a sign of explosives used, in the WTC dust?

9/13/01 is when the head of the EPA said the air was safe to breathe and the water safe to drink. She should have been their champion demanding military style respirators, ample food and rest areas, etc. for those working on the pile.

People who were there have reported that they knew the EPA was lying but they were too busy working at Ground Zero.

Did she slap the EPA for lying about the dangers in the dust either then or later when it came out that the White House altered the EPA's 9/11 report? Though the city's sewers keeps air quality checks going because they are open, we were told only EPA data was available. She did not demand to see the City air quality numbers to double check EPA data, like when she signed onto this war.

How could she have not known that exposure to toxic chemicals can kill people?

After years of her ineffective strategy of study the problem, rather than take an active role in reducing the effects of World Trade Center Illness (registry vs. health care), she's now getting help for on site workers. But what about the people who live and work in the area? Many are already dead. Sick people have marched on Washington for attention since their representatives (not just Senator Clinton) failed to represent THEM in D.C. by delivering solutions to the problems New Yorkers face.

Senator Clinton was elected to do a job...represent NY in the Senate. The senate controls a lot of power, which could have been used to clean up the area (they are still finding body parts in the area as of this year).

Here's the short list of toxins folks were exposed to from Senator Clinton supporter:

Natural Resources Defense Council

WTC TOXIC MATERIAL LISTFROM NRDC REPORT



Item
Amount


Building Materials
1.2 million tons
Jet Fuel
thousands of gallons
Dioxins

Mercury from computers and light bulbs

Asbestos
300-400 Tons
Concrete
424,000 Tons
Fiberglass

Lead from 50,000 Personal Computers - 4 lbs. ea.
200,000 lbs
Main Frame Computers
300
Wire and cables
Hundreds of miles
Transformer Oil contaminated with PCB's
130,000 gallons

From Plastics (still looking for amounts)

Polyvinyl

Chloride

Copper

Furans

polybrominated diphenyl ethers

Small hazardous waste generating entities


NRDC has estimated that there were approximately 50,000 pc's in the World Trade Center with 4 lbs of lead each. 50,000 X 4 = 200,000 lbs of lead just from the pc's. Office furniture, fabrics and human remains were transformed into dust in the time it took for the two towers to fall. Rescue workers report that they didn't find a computer, desk or chair.

The area is not cleaned yet, not even in the homes because asbestos does not wash out in the laundry.

The senate also has the ability to call for a vetted investigation into what really happened on 9/11. 19 lucky Arabs who just happened to pick the day when the military was engaged in war games is not standing up to the truth. Instead we got the 9/11 Commission report which speaks loud and long but says nothing.

Please check out Senator Clinton's activities on and after 9/11. The toxic dust spread all over the place and did not stop at 14th Street as reported. Is it possible she did not know that paper from the WTC was found on Long Island, yet the government said the dust stopped on 14th Street. The city was put on lock down. Why was she not on the phone with the call GET THOSE PEOPLE OUT OF THERE!!!!?




Why was there not one aircraft carrier with the ability to respond to a crisis paying attention to protecting New York, Washington, Pennsylvania...? How is this O.K. with her since the senate helps appropriate and approve the military budget?

Based on her response to 9/11 so far, I don't think Senator Clinton is qualified to be president yet.

By the way, when I contacted Senator Clinton at the time I was told that she only responds to material from New York and contact my senator. I did and was told IF there was a problem Senators Clinton and Schumer would handle it and they said nothing. Since they don't to listen to me, I've been posting initially on the New York Times site Abuzz and over the years I've put up notes on the subject of World Trade Center Illness at www.geocities.com/cureworks2. Still haven't heard from her.

I'm voting for Senator Obama as the next president. With the 5% Black blood rule, which use to be enough to get a person lynched, we've already had 5 Black Presidents, Jefferson, Jackson, Lincoln, Harding and Coolidge according to Dr. Leroy Vaughn, MD, MBA, Historian were Black. During their era's were some of the greatest times of this nation. Jefferson and Jackson organized us. Lincoln freed and unified us. Harding and Coolidge were the Roaring 20's.

Senator Obama is a smart, Harvard educated lawyer. His call for change has the potential to open a floodgate of common sense. Use the truth razor of only the truth is true.

Please, just keep your eyes and mind open. Learning is change and to be effective, it must include all of us. I'm sure, as we work together to build a better nation, based on freedom, truth and justice, we will discover and implement ways to heal. Together, we are getting to what Willie Nelson calls A PEACEFUL SOLUTION.

McCain's YouTube Problem Just Became a Nightmare

IRAQ WAR SOLD BY SHADING TRUTH McClellan Tells Russert

We join all in praying for Tim Russert and his family.

Barack Obama in St. Louis, MO

Senator McCain is wrong for the country. His connection/leadership roles in the industrial/military/congressional complex makes change impossible for him. His background leaves him unprepared to solve our economic problems. His indebtness is to the rich.
Obama '08. No special interest please.

Kucinich presents Bush impeachment articles 6-9-08

Change that Works for You: Raleigh, NC

Barack Speaks To HQ Staff & Volunteers

Congratulations Senator Barack Obama on winning the Democratic nomination for President of the United States.

Thank you, your family, friends, staff and associates for your great contributions to the expansion of the American Dream.

The all that is one in truth.

Barack Speaks To HQ Staff & Volunteers

Hillary Clinton's Concession Speech

Learning is change.

Barack Obama for president.

Let's rethink things all the way through to the highest good for all concerned.

Obama '08.

Day 11 9-11 Hunger Strike at Senator McCain's Office

Based on results, John McCain doesn't care about the truth.
Prayerfully, this experience will help him come to grips with the truth. His denial of what really happened regarding 9/11 is a clue for how he will run the country if elected. Just another person of the lie.
9/11 was an inside job. Now what!!
Thank you Blair Gadsby and crew.
Visit www.Hungry4Truth.com for updates on this hero's mission work.

Day 9 9-11 hunger strike at John McCain's office

John McCain is still ignoring a citizen's request.

Demand 9/11 Truth now!!!

911 Truth Hunger Striker - Topic for Town Hall Meeting

Senator John McCain and Senator Barack Obama should discuss what really happened on 9/11 in their town hall meetings over the summer. Blair Gadsby, in the webeo above and Arizona State Senator Karen Johnson, in the webeo below, should ask the opening questions.

Senator McCain has been a big backer of the 19 lucky Arabs story. The majority of the American people know that 9/11 was an inside job.

It is best to strike when the iron is hot. Phoenix activist Blair Gadsby, a professor of Religious Studies, is in the 10th day of his hunger strike regarding 9/11 truth. He's striking outside of Senator McCain's office in Phoenix.

Here's the link announcing his hunger strike which began Memorial Day weekend. Excerpts only are posted in this article.

"Hungry for the Truth - 911 Truth Hunger Strike Against Senator John McCain Phoenix 911 TruthTim King

Hunger strike for 9/11 truth, Memorial Day, 5:00PM,May 26, 2008 at the office of Senator John McCain,

5353 N. 16th St., Phoenix, AZ

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Phoenix 9/11 Truth Activist to Start Hunger Strike at McCain's Office

Contact: Tim King
e-mail: wasichu10@yahoo.com

Phoenix, AZ, May 21, 2008 - In an effort to bring national attention to the 9/11 truth issue, Phoenix activist, Blair Gadsby, a professor of Religious Studies, plans to start a hunger strike on Memorial Day, at the Phoenix office of Senator John McCain. Gadsby is putting the spotlight on McCain because of McCain's avowed support for the official account of 9/11. McCain is the author of the foreword to the 2006 Popular Mechanics book, Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts."

Thank you hero State Senator Karen S. Johnson, R-Mesa,

"Lawmaker asks McCain to talk with 9/11 theorists

Matthew Benson
The Arizona Republic
Jun. 3, 2008 10:42 PM

An Arizona state senator is petitioning presumptive GOP presidential nominee John McCain to meet with 9/11 conspiracy theorists, including an adjunct professor from Scottsdale who has been fasting outside McCain's Phoenix office for more than a week.

State Sen. Karen Johnson, a Mesa Republican, delivered a letter to McCain's Senate office Tuesday asking that he sit down with Scottsdale activist Blair Gadsby and a pair of leading members of the 9/11 Truth Movement to consider alternative explanations for the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and the collapse of the World Trade Center towers. Gadsby's fast outside McCain's Senate office entered its 10th day today."

State Senator Johnson (I hope she runs for McCain's seat) has posted her findings

"Backing my claims about 9/11 questions

Karen S. Johnson, Commentary May 2, 2008

A recent letter to the editor asked for evidence of my claims regarding the tragedy of 9/11. Below I present some points that are presently known. I won’t be able to convince anyone who doesn’t want to be convinced, but for those who are willing to deal with factual evidence, consider the following:

• 37 different people reported explosions in the basement of the World Trade Center Towers before the first plane hit, and seismic equipment recorded both the explosions and the impacts. In addition, people were injured by the explosions in the basement, providing well-documented evidence. Yet this evidence is ignored.

•The media and government have promoted the “pancake theory” as the cause of the collapse of the Twin Towers — that is, fire weakened the steel support beams, causing the upper floors to collapse. Then the weight of the collapsing floors above caused the floors below to collapse. This theory is not consistent with scientific principles or the facts. Frank Legge, who has a doctorate in chemistry, and Tony Szamboti, a mechanical engineer, reported in December in the Journal of 9/11 Studies: “It appears therefore that the official concept of a free-fall collapse of the upper portion through the initiation story, due to heat effects from fire, is a fantasy. If the temperature did become high enough for collapse to occur” — and everyone agrees that it did not — “it could not have happened in the observed manner. In particular it could not have been sudden and thus could not have produced the velocity, and hence the momentum and kinetic energy, upon which the official story depends for the second stage of collapse.”

• The theory that the buildings collapsed due to controlled-demolition explosives, however, is consistent with scientific principles and the facts. The “demolition” theory, in fact, is the only one which scientists have been able to corroborate. That is, “… all observations are in accord with the use of explosives in a time sequence.” (Legge and Szamboti, December, Journal of 9/11 Studies.)

• Peer-reviewed reports indicate that the masses of dust particles created by the disaster contained tiny pieces of metal that had been exposed to both extreme temperatures (higher than could have been produced by a burning office or burning airplane fuel) and extreme pressure (such as an explosion) that would fragment material into minute particles. Official reports ignore this.

• In December, physicist Steven Jones announced the discovery of thermite chips in World Trade Center dust samples. The chemical composition of these chips are an exact match to known thermite samples used in controlled demolitions — further corroboration that explosive devices were involved.

• Steel support beams recovered from the site of the World Trade Center exhibit cut edges that are characteristic of thermite used to slice steel support beams in building demolitions but are not characteristic of steel beams that have been burned in a fire.

When the 9/11 Commission Report was finally released, it was woefully inadequate. It never even addressed the collapse of Building 7, for example. Former FBI Director Louis Freeh has stated that there are inaccuracies in the report and unanswered questions. Even the two chairmen of the 9/11 Commission — Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton — have accused the CIA of “obstructing” the commission, and one commissioner, U.S. Sen. Max Cleland, resigned, stating that the commission was “compromised.”

Private individuals with specialized knowledge — scientists, engineers, architects, demolitions experts, and the firefighters and police officers who were on the scene on Sept. 11, 2001, have tested theories, constructed models, provided testimony, and dug for the truth about what really happened on 9/11. They have been ignored by media and the government.

The mainstream media parrot the less-than-credible conclusions of the 9/11 Commission without giving any thought to the many omissions and inconsistencies. In a truly free country, the press would ask hard questions and do real investigating, but this is not happening. Only the alternative media, such as Internet news sites, have done any solid investigating.

The events of 9/11 led immediately to the creation of the Department of Homeland Security and passage of the Patriot Act (what double-speak), both of which deprive us of Constitutional rights and have brought us to the brink of becoming a police state. Homeland Security is currently trying to force a national ID card down our throats, although some governors have politely (or not so politely) told Secretary Michael Chertoff where he can go.

If we’re going to sacrifice our freedom, there ought to be a very good reason, and we have a right to know what that is. It isn’t enough for government to say, “Trust me.” It’s way past time for Congress to authorize an independent investigation of 9/11 that will consider the mass of new evidence that has been gathered in the past seven years. The longer they stall, the more suspicions grow.

Sen. Karen S. Johnson, R-Mesa, represents District 18."

The nation is ready to discuss 9/11 as an inside job.

Senator Obama is talking about the failings of the Bush Administration.

Let the town hall meetings begin!!!

Hillary Clinton Response - On 9/11

I'm sorry but based on her response to the continuing 9/11 World Trade Center Illness crisis, I don't think Senator Hillary Clinton is effective.
She said on 9/11 "We are going to support the president." Not we are going to support New Yorkers and others exposed. Based on results, she chose a medical strategy of study rather than be proactive.
The result, both first responders and citizens have marched on Washington for help dealing with this crisis.
Is her support of the President Bush why she was silent when the EPA said the air was safe to breathe and the water safe to drink?
Is that why she chose to study the problem of WTC Illness rather than provide medical support and helpful information for folks exposed to the toxic soup called WTC dust?
Is that why she voted for the war we are in now and the next one planned?
How is this senator change?
Obama '08.